Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:37
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What's the most impressive feature of Claude AI according to its users?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Neurosteroids identified as potential therapy for treatment-resistant depression - Medical Xpress
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it’s too late - The Hill
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Microsoft will finally stop bugging Windows users about Edge — but only in Europe - The Verge
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Musk Denies Ketamine Use Following New York Times Report - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
23 Doctors Who Said Something Crass, Cruel, Or CRINGEY To Their Patients - BuzzFeed
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we? - The Washington Post